Raising social involvement, self awareness and self improvement topics, because our communities are the sum of our personal beliefs, behaviors, action or inaction. Only "we" can improve our family, work place, school, city, country, etc.
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Extra Revenues: MN DFL Wants to Spend It
So what do you folks think we should do with all that "extra revenue" during these "good times"?
Spend some - What is your rationale for increasing the size of government over this one time "good times" windfall? Or are you thinking one time expeditures?
Typically government grows excessively during "good times" and then the DFL bemoans draconian cuts that occur during bad times. Of course forgetting that the extra spending was only temporary. Remember the gnashing of teeth when the food programs were reduced back to their normal levels after the recession.
Save some - We just refunded the saftey net fund reserves last year. What is your rationale for saving more?
Tax cuts - For who? In what way? Last year the DFL gave the money back to folks who paid little or none in MN income tax.
I think they should give enough to higher ed to freeze tuition for another two years. I think they should expand early learning scholarships. I think they should use some for roads and bridges. I would would also do some sort of tax cut (don't know for who or how much) because taxpayers would be mad if they didn't get something back. Last, maybe they need to increase the reserves so next time there is a shortfall they won't have to borrow from schools.
Pay down the debt! The report I heard was the state has 85billion in debt when you include unfounded pensions. If we don't fund these in the good times, when should we?
Spend: I think a one-time boost in transportation funding would be warranted, as well as increasing funding to nursing homes.
Save: I could argue in favor of increasing the cap on reserves.
Taxes: I think the gas tax increase is important. I would trade an increase in the gas tax for an income tax cut (on the lowest bracket) or sales tax reform.
So it seems there is some question as to if there is a pension problem. And my question is... Is the problem that government promised too much or they have not set enough funds aside? Fiscal Excellence Post Pension Paper
Most companies figured out that they could not be competitive by offering traditional full blown defined benefit pensions. Why do we think the Public employees should still get these? Just curious.
I think sales tax reform would be better for the economy, but last session demonstrated how impossible that task would be in the current political environment.
Spend some, save some, some tax cuts.
ReplyDeleteSpend some - What is your rationale for increasing the size of government over this one time "good times" windfall? Or are you thinking one time expeditures?
ReplyDeleteTypically government grows excessively during "good times" and then the DFL bemoans draconian cuts that occur during bad times. Of course forgetting that the extra spending was only temporary. Remember the gnashing of teeth when the food programs were reduced back to their normal levels after the recession.
Save some - We just refunded the saftey net fund reserves last year. What is your rationale for saving more?
Tax cuts - For who? In what way? Last year the DFL gave the money back to folks who paid little or none in MN income tax.
I think they should give enough to higher ed to freeze tuition for another two years. I think they should expand early learning scholarships. I think they should use some for roads and bridges. I would would also do some sort of tax cut (don't know for who or how much) because taxpayers would be mad if they didn't get something back. Last, maybe they need to increase the reserves so next time there is a shortfall they won't have to borrow from schools.
ReplyDeletePay down the debt! The report I heard was the state has 85billion in debt when you include unfounded pensions. If we don't fund these in the good times, when should we?
ReplyDeleteSpend: I think a one-time boost in transportation funding would be warranted, as well as increasing funding to nursing homes.
ReplyDeleteSave: I could argue in favor of increasing the cap on reserves.
Taxes: I think the gas tax increase is important. I would trade an increase in the gas tax for an income tax cut (on the lowest bracket) or sales tax reform.
Harvey, Welcome.
ReplyDeleteSo it seems there is some question as to if there is a pension problem. And my question is... Is the problem that government promised too much or they have not set enough funds aside?
Fiscal Excellence Post
Pension Paper
Most companies figured out that they could not be competitive by offering traditional full blown defined benefit pensions. Why do we think the Public employees should still get these? Just curious.
Hi Sean,
ReplyDeleteI think total taxes are more than progressive enough, however I do understand that Liberals like to see themselves as Robinhood.
How do you look in tights carrying a bow?
An income tax on the lowest bracket is an income tax cut for *everyone* who pays income tax.
ReplyDeleteIt's an appropriate offset to raising gasoline taxes, which tend to hit lower-income taxpayers harder.
Good Point. I'll need to give that trade off more thought when I get a chance.
ReplyDeleteI think sales tax reform would be better for the economy, but last session demonstrated how impossible that task would be in the current political environment.
ReplyDelete