Thursday, November 1, 2018

We Need a Third Party?

Eric Black at MinnPost pointed me to this Gallup Perceived Need for Third Major Party Remains High in U.S. Eric is a big fan of countries with parliamentary systems.

Now I don't like either party since I am somewhat fiscal conservative and socially liberal... This interested me very much and I reviewed the Gallup piece linked above. Unfortunately their implications section did not fill me with hope.
"At various points since 2007, a majority of Americans have contended that a third major political party is needed in the U.S., while the minority have believed the two major parties adequately represent the American people. That pattern continues today with an unprecedented five-year stretch when demand for a third major party has been 57% or higher, including 71% or higher among independents. 
While this may seem promising for any group thinking about promoting such a party, it is one thing to say a third major party is needed and quite another to be willing to join or support it. Americans' backing of the idea could fall under a mentality of "the more, the merrier," in which they would be pleased to have more viable political choices even if they vote mainly for candidates from the two major parties. And that says nothing of the structural barriers third parties face in trying to get on the ballot. 
With most Republicans and Democrats viewing their own party favorably, the real constituency for a third party is likely to be political independents, meaning the party would have to be politically centrist. Thus far, the Green and Libertarian parties have succeeded in running national presidential campaigns but not in attracting big numbers of registered members. But with record numbers of Americans frustrated with the way the nation is being governed, the country could be inching closer to having enough people who want an alternative to the status quo to make it a reality, at least with the right candidate at the helm."
Well...  Maybe someday...

7 comments:

  1. Lots of folks want a party that will give them stuff but won't ask them to pay for it. A lot of it has much to do with negative advertising.

    --Hiram

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that sounds like most modern US citizens. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I mean DEMs want a lot of money or services, and want "the rich" to pay for it...

    and the GOP wants to keep spending for the most part while borrowing with no payment plan...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I mean DEMs want a lot of money or services, and want "the rich" to pay for it...

    Well, the poor can't pay for them. And unlike the rich, they can't cheat on their taxes.

    --Hiram

    ReplyDelete
  5. The poor can certainly pay... That is how the world ran in most of the world's history... The powerful ruled and the weak worked and paid...

    The last 100+ years has been quite a change...

    ReplyDelete
  6. And the rich and powerful invariably work to consolidate more wealth and power.

    Moose

    ReplyDelete
  7. It seems that you are stereotyping again...

    Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and thousands of other "rich and powerful" have dedicated there lives and fortunes to helping the power and powerless.

    And as my Parents would say... A poor person has pretty much never hired and paid many employees... :-)

    ReplyDelete