Trump's Economic Miracle: Not...

I am sad to say that most Trump True Believers will likely believe the charlatan. If you like to live in the real world this is a good Fact Check. AP FACT CHECK: Trump dubs tax cuts an "economic miracle"

I mean it is easy to make the country's economy growth if you are willing to borrow trillions of dollars from our kids. But at least be honest about what you are doing.  This is the same game Dayton and the DEMs did in MN, they passed huge bonding bills and claimed economic success. 

It is easy to grow an economy by borrowing...   Duh... I could go one heck of a spending spree if I was putting it on someone else credit card...

"KUDLOW: "As the economy gears up, more people working, better jobs and careers, those revenues come rolling in, and the deficit, which is one of the other criticisms, is coming down, and it's coming down rapidly." 

THE FACTS: Nope. 

Since the fiscal year started in October, Treasury Department reports show the federal government has recorded a $385.4 billion deficit, a 12 percent jump from the same period in the previous year. 

The Congressional Budget Office was even more blunt in a long-term assessment released Tuesday. 

It estimates that the national debt — the sum of yearly deficits — will be $2.2 trillion higher in 2027 than it had previously forecast, largely a consequence of Trump's 10-year, $1.5 trillion tax cut. The size of the debt could be even higher if provisions of the tax cut that are set to expire are, instead, renewed."

And worse yet Trump wants to double down on this childish behavior.  I say childish because responsible adults pay their bills, they don't charge up their credit card and give the bill to their kids.

A few more interesting links:

CNN So much for raises or investment... Stock buy backs boom

NBC WH Promised 70% Would Go to Workers.  It Did Not

From personal experience I can confirm that my employer is not sharing the new found wealth.  And based on most sources this seems typical.

The good news of course is that I am fairly wealthy and benefit from increases in the stock market. However now Trump is working to disrupt that also.

The Tribes have Misperceptions

A FB Friend posted this. 538 Democrats Are Wrong About Republicans. Republicans Are Wrong About Democrats. Surprise !!!  It is worth a read.  Thoughts?

SCOTUS Against Forced Dues

Thank heavens, SCOTUS just got rid of the forced payments to unions. Or as VOX describes the action. The Supreme Court decision gutting public sector unions, explained. How to understand Janus v. AFSCME.


I am sorry but I see Public Employee Unions as terrible for America.  Just what American citizens do not need... Organizations who work to:

• Protect employees based on age rather than capability or results.
• Raise wages based on age rather than capability or results.
• Protect employees against any accountability or performance measures.
• Increase the cost of government through higher wages, more employees, more work rules, more bureaucracy, etc

Hopefully this helps our Public Service Systems to become more effective and efficient over time.

Good News and Liberal Hypocrisy

First the news topic, MSN Federal Judge Orders Family Reunification The judge also set time limits which is good.

The second speaks to the Liberal elites hypocrisy:

"Sessions spoke Tuesday to a crowd at the conservative-leaning conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, and accused critics of his “zero tolerance” immigration policy of hypocrisy.

“These same people live in gated communities, many of them, and are featured at events where you have to have an ID to even come in to hear em speak. They like a little security around themselves,” he said.

“If you try to scale the fence they’d be even too happy to have you arrested and separated from your children.”

The last line brought laughs and a few cheers from the audience in Los Angeles, which was greeted with protests by those who see the separation of children from their undocumented parents as inhumane."  MSN Session Jokes about Child Separation

Along those lines, here is an interesting study I heard about one day on NPR.  WAPO Researchers put two Spanish-speakers on a train and changed commuters’ views of immigration


It pretty much aligns with what I have experienced in the behaviors of suburban and rural Liberals.  They are very supportive of the poor, the immigrants, the minorities, etc until they start to move into their neighborhoods or schools.  I mean SO MANY middle and upper class Liberal households have moved to get their kids into that Whiter more affluent district.


Thoughts?

Farm Stress Can Be Deadly

CBS Farmers are killing themselves in staggering numbers

MinnPost Minnesota is considering doubling its number of rural mental health counselors. To two.

MPR As milk prices decline, worries about dairy farmer suicides rise

I had better keep an eye on my friends. I heard some of the reasons why the farmers are such a high risk group:

• Many are single men (ie reluctant to see Doctor, Counselor, etc)
• Many are trying to "save the family farm" that has been in the family for generations (ie big stress / guilt)
• Little control over their costs or revenues (ie market determined and some farmers are not skilled at timing their "buying and selling")
• Big bets can lead to HUGE losses

Personally I think things are going to get pretty tough if the commodity prices fall.  Possibly exacerbated by Trump's trade war.


There are a lot of farmers who bought real expensive land and equipment when commodity prices were high.  And Lord knows the costs are not falling. (ie equipment, fuel, fertilizer, seed, etc)


The graph linked to above is offset by one benefit, the yield has increased on average due to better seeds and farming practices.

Travel Ban Rev 3 is Upheld

CNN Supreme Court Upholds Travel Ban
I never did understand why folks considered this issue a "religious issue".  I mean only a small percentage of Muslims live in the countries that are named.  And Lord knows security is pretty weak in the countries named and/or folks there do not wish America well.  Thoughts?

Though it is odd that Russia doesn't make the list given their recent behaviors in America. Oh yeah, I forgot that Putin is black mailing Trump. :-)

GOP Hypocrisy

This is an amusing piece. USA Today: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Guide to Refusing Service: Christian Baker Can, Red Hen Can't.


Of course I also wonder where the Liberals are who support that "All Business Must Do Business With All Comers".  Shouldn't they be boycotting the Red Hen or something? :-)

Trump Visits Duluth

Trump visited Duluth, here are some thoughts from Eric at MinnPost, and Hiram.

"A president who lies whee the interests of children are concerned was greeted by a rapturous reception in Duluth. Minnesotans should be ashamed."  --Hiram

Thoughts?

G2A Deal with the Devil

Democrats Blocking Immigration Bill

CNN The depressing predictability of the immigration debate. Apparently the DEMs will block the GOP Moderate's bill over border security funding... It is very odd that DEMs are against government spending in this case... I mean they have no problem spending hundreds of billions each year on social programs, however they won't make a one time payment to protect the Dreamers and to put the immigration topic behind us.

"What's more: Even if, by hook or by crook, the House manages to pass this compromise bill, it's virtually certain to be dead on arrival in the Senate. Even if all 50 Republican senators voted for it -- John McCain remains in Arizona battling brain cancer -- the bill would need 10 votes from Democrats to bring it to the floor for debate. And unless you have been living on another planet for the last few years, you know that 10 Democrats ain't voting for legislation that provides $25 billion in funding for a southern border wall."

It is interesting how the DEMs seemed to have no more desire to solve this immigration issue than the GOP folks. Maybe they are the ones wanting to use the Dreamers in the election.

Sean said the following in the previous post's comments. "The Democratic Party or "liberals" aren't generally supporting open borders, no control, no limits, or any of the other nonsense you've tried to attribute to them in this thread. You can see what they voted for in 2013. You can see the sort of proposals brought forward earlier this year (like McCain-Coons or Graham-Durbin)."

Since they are reluctant to compromise now, I am thinking this is more about DEM politics than helping people. Over there I posted the following comment and questions:

"Ultimately this comes down to what is the purpose of the American Immigration policy? 

1. To help 1+ million people a year enter the "American Lifeboat".
2. To help America succeed by bringing in people who can help our country thrive. 

Or just assuming 1 million per year...What mix of the above? 

I think 200,000 "Life Boaters" and 800,00 "Make America Greaters" sounds much wiser than our current mix. 

That way we can afford to keep helping people in their home countries.

We apparently let ~1.6 million people immigrate her in 2016, and we are near a record rate...  So:  

• How many immigrants per year is the correct amount?
• What should be the characteristics of people we allow in?

Liberals and the Southern Border

I keep asking of people with more Liberal views.

"So what is your proposal to control access on our Southern border?

Or do you support no Southern border control and allowing anyone who gets to the border to enter our country?

Please think before you answer... There are ~7 BILLION people on earth and many of them are poor destitute and would love to live in the USA.  

How many do you want to let in? Remembering that we are already at record levels. And our poor have a hard time making a living wage here...

And just raising taxes and government spending is not an adequate answer.

Instead of complaining and name calling...  Give us solutions. "

And all I receive in exchange is the sounds of crickets. Which leads me to believe that they support pretty much uncontrolled unlimited legal / illegal immigration.


Does that mean anyone who shows up at our border and says...  "My (our) life sucks in my (our) home country"... is allowed in?  Without yearly quantity limits?


Help us more conservative folks understand your plan...

Trump Approval / Disapproval Update

Eric at Minnpost has some very interesting information here. This seems logical to me, but the Trump True Believers will likely say it is just fake news...

"I’ll just pass along the change in Trump’s statewide ratings in the three states that according to many analysts determined the outcome of the election, the three “Blue Wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, all of which Trump carried narrowly. 

In Pennsylvania, Trump’s approval when he took office was +10. In the latest polling, it’s -4.  In Michigan, it’s dropped 17 percentage points, from +8 to -9.  And in Wisconsin it’s fallen 18 points from +6 to -12. 

On balance, according to 538’s table, Trump’s approval numbers are still above water in 20 states, 12 of them in the south, including the key swing state of Florida, where is net approval has declined from +22 on Inauguration Day to +5 in this roundup." Eric Black

I am very interested to see what happens in November...

Additional Links
FiveThirtyEight overview of the state-by-state Trump approval polls
RCP Trump Approval Disapproval Summary

RCP Senate Map

Republicans Approve of Breakup Policy

CNN Majority oppose policy that causes family separation, but Republicans approve


I guess I personally agree with the administration's "zero tolerance" policy of criminally charging people who cross the border illegally.  I mean the goal of walls, border patrols, and now criminal charges is to dissuade people from trying to enter our country illegally.  Which as you know, I whole heartedly support.  (too many people are hurt / killed during the migration and we want to encourage legal migration with back ground checks and searches completed)


I think the previous policy of catch, release and set a court date seemed stupid and not effective.  It was like saying please attempt to violate our border...  And if we don't catch you, you win...  And if we do catch you, you get to stay here for awhile and may get lucky.  I mean how is that supposed to dissuade anyone.


That said... How can we enforce our laws and our borders without breaking up families? Here are some possibilities, if border control catches a family... 

1. Give them a bus ticket back to their home country
2. Drive them back to the Mexican border and drop them off.
3. Setup refugee tent cities on the border and deposit people there until their court date

Now the big problem though is that having toddlers removed from their Mom's arms seems like political suicide to me.  What was Trump and the GOP thinking?


Thoughts?

FBI Inspector General Report

Apparently Trump read a different IG report than the rest of us.  He apparently thinks this report had something to do with him, which it did not...

I am happy the report concluded that:

• The FBI behaved in an admirable and non-biased manner
• Comey did push back against the politically motivated Attorney General (ie was insubordinate)
• A couple of FBI employees were anti-Trump (go figure..)

All of which we already understood.  No surprises here...

NPR IG Report Summary

Now here is a piece from someone who disagrees.  Of course, my thought was that if FBI folks were out to prevent Trump from getting the Presidency, they did a really bad job.  I mean not one leak about Trump's campaign members meeting with Russian agents made the news before the election.

It may make for a good "spy / conspiracy theory" movie some day... :-)

Justifying Trump's Lack of Decorum

A Far Right FB friend posted "a piece defending President Donald Trump’s lack of decorum and dignity in office". It was originally "spread widely online, attributed to Dr. Marshall Kamena, the Democratic mayor of Livermore, California:" Snopes: He Fights It turned out that it was actually written by a Far Right comedian.

 

Of course my friend made the mistake of writing this with the post... "I leave it here for your honest and open consideration." Which normally would be fine, except that I took it as a open invitation to comment. 😁

 

Now the reason I am posting this is to help people understand the perspective of Trump True Believers. From the comments we exchanged, these folks truly believe:

• the piece is 100% true and factual
• that the "Liberal Tribe" is evil, underhanded and corrupt
• the media is complicit in furthering the Lefts power
• that achieving their "ends" (ie Conservative Judges, Power to the States, Christian Based Laws, Weakening of the Federal Government, etc) pretty much any justifies any means. (including Trump)
• Other

My thoughts after participating in that exchange are similar to when I enter a discussion with folks from the Far Left:

• Is there any way for the Far Left and Far Right to ever "just get along"?
• If not get along: at least accept that neither side is good or bad, right or wrong, etc
• With cable news and social media "echo chambers" and "their rock throwing" continually reinforcing the views of the extremes, is there any way to bring our citizens back together?
• I don't hold out a lot of hope as long as Tribe Liberal and Tribe Conservative continue see and paint each other as enemies of the USA... 😨

What are Children Entitled to in a Parent(s)?

I have to vent about the MinnPost Moderators again.  They published Ian's snarky "Judge not... Lest you be judged" comment. However they would not accept any of my 6 variations of "Ian, What do you think children are entitled to in a parent(s)? (ie level of emotional stability, responsibility, knowledge, maturity, financial stability, independence, role model, etc)  My first concern is the children, not the adults that interact with them."

11 Facts About Child Abuse
More Statistics
G2A How to Win the War on Poverty

The good news is that they did allow me to respond with Paul's latest far Left comment...  You know the one's where he blames the Conservatives and businesses for all the ills of our poor citizens.

"The controllable reasons poor people are poor seem pretty predictable:

• low achievement in the area of education or skills
• unwilling to do high hour, dirty or high travel jobs that are unpopular but sometimes pay more
• pursuing their passion in a poor paying field (ie arts, charity, etc)
• unwilling to relocate from their community
• spend too much and or have too many children
• addicted to smoking, alcohol, drugs, gambling, etc

Now how again does giving these people tax dollars help them escape poverty in the long term? 

Now I whole heartedly agree that society needs to care for those who are or become physically or mentally disabled.  And we need to provide a safety trampoline to help people up from temporary problems. 

However the idea that "work requirements" are in some way inhumane seems silly to me.
And please remember that low paying jobs are low paying is because there is too much supply and too little demand...  That is why I support deport illegal workers and stopping their entry until the lower wage jobs pay more. :-)" G2A