This seems like a good proposal, what do you all think?
Sorry for that very short post... I left home Tuesday at 4 AM, travelled to Beijing, travelled to Tianjin met with customers and travelled back to Beijing last night. I am always amazed how I can be "awake" and moving for days, and yet seem to be in some lower state of consciousness... Well last night I hit the bed and was out for 12+ hours. Now I feel a bit better.
Due to customer conflicts
I am trapped in Beijing this weekend, however I have finally scheduled time tomorrow to see the Great Wall. The concierge assured me that this is the
best tour since President Obama went there. :-)
Now back to the topic of the post.
White House Immigration Framework
NPR WH Outline
VOX Explains
The VOX piece covers the topic pretty well, and I think these will be the DEM sticking points.
"It mentions “same treatment of illegal aliens, regardless of country of origin” — an allusion to changing the law that prevents Border Patrol agents from summarily deporting unaccompanied children from countries other than Mexico. And it refers to changing “the ‘catch and release’ policy through which immigrants are released while awaiting a hearing” — which would make it harder for asylum seekers to get a lawyer while their cases are pending.
Democrats have rejected past attempts at these changes as cruel: a crackdown on people fleeing gang violence that doesn’t make anyone safer. It’s not clear how many of them will accept these changes now as the cost of citizenship for DREAMers.
Preventing people from sponsoring parents, adult children, or siblings for US citizenship. The White House, led by Trump, has demanded limits on family-based immigration — which accounts for the majority of legal immigration to the US — as part of a DACA deal. The Trump framework would limit family sponsorship to “spouses and minor children” — thus presumably changing the F3 and F4 visas, used for US citizens to bring adult children and siblings, respectively, to the US, as well as an unlimited visa for citizens to sponsor their parents. (Reports indicate that people currently in line for those visas — a backlog that extends for years — will be able to remain in line.)"
I heard a Liberal woman on CNN who was adamant that the USA should keep all illegal workers and accept all people who show up at our borders because
"they are just trying to improve their lives"!!! Which of course is one of the silliest rationales I have heard since after travelling the world for decades I have never met anyone who is intentionally trying to ruin their life!!! I have however met:
- People who have beliefs and behaviors who make their life worse.
- People who work to improve their lives in their home country.
So do you think the Far Left and Far Right can swallow their pride long enough to pass something that is as common sense as this proposal? Or are they going to stay entrenched in their near religious zealotry?