For more evidence of racial bias, look no further than school funding The Hill
In Most States, Poorest School Districts Get Less Funding US News
Why White School Districts Have So Much More Money NPR
Jerry and I have been arguing about school funding over
G2A The Poor Kids are Screwed :-( , so the above seemed timely.
If you did not know there is a
137 page guide to explain MN school funding. It can be found on this
MN House Education Research page.
Since MN is a Liberal state, the funding formula tries to compensate based on student demographic and community factors. However even with this, the
wealthy communities can always pass referendums to give their children more. Not necessarily a bad thing, except that as usual the rich kids get more and the poor kids get less..
Now if a poor kid lives in a conservative state, it can be much worse.
For example, in St. Louis County (Mo.) the school districts with the highest proportion of Black students - Jennings and Riverview - take in less than half the money per student compared to nearby Brentwood, which generated more than $21,000 per student in 2017-18.
The sad irony then is that the conservatives will blame the schools for not teaching as well in the poor communities while giving them half the money to teach very challenging students and families. (ie unlucky kids)
Now we know the answer to helping the Unlucky Kids.
"In the short term, states can account for current spending levels when reducing education budgets. While across-the-board cuts that take the same amount of state funding away from all districts might sound fair, a better approach would be to cut from high-spending districts first and only then make broader adjustments after things have been leveled so existing inequities aren't exacerbated or ignored.
Long term, more substantive school finance reforms are needed and the best solution is to untether the relationship between school funding and zip codes. Ideally, local property wealth should play no role in determining school funding levels. Dollars instead should be pooled at the state level and allocated transparently based on enrollment and student needs." The Hill
Unfortunately many folks are concerned about only their children and their schools. :-( Which of course is very shortsighted given how much children who fail academically will cost us all over time. (ie prison, welfare, lost productivity gains, lost tax revenues, etc)