Belief vs Reality
"You responded with:
"I guess I would say that these statements indicate a belief that citizens are intentionally working to oppress others. I disagree with this belief system. "
to these statements:
"intentional disinvestment in American society by the moneyed class"
"assault on public education by those who would see it abolished"
"discrimination toward their skin color, ethnicity, or socioeconomic position"
Can you actually refute these three points, without resorting to discussion of 'belief?' Whether or not you believe a fact exists, does not stop that fact from existing.
We know that the Koch brothers spent heavily in many states and help fund ALEC, and are in no small part responsible for the election of Scott Walker in WI, and the subsequent assault on public unions, teachers, reproductive rights, environmental regulations and public education funding in that state. We know that many GOP members willfully intended to shut down the US government and have slashed funding for valuable public research.
We know that there are concerted efforts to disenfranchise whole swaths of the population among the states, and those efforts are explicitly stated as such by the GOP party members who pushed and advanced them.
These are all verifiable events. Belief is not relevant in this discussion.
And yes, perspective IS an interesting thing... but only when you can actually CHANGE your perspective, which I don't believe you are actually doing, at least not enough to fathom the reality of existence of those who are different from you or your immediate peer network." Jonathan
2 Sides to Every Topic
Now the question is can you see both sides?
Assault on public unions vs Allowing market to set correct compensation, thereby saving money for the tax payers.
Assault on Teachers vs Helping the Students learn by ensuring only the most effective Educators are in their classrooms and the expectations are clearly defined.
Assault on reproductive rights vs Preventing the stilling of a human heart for someone's convenience.
Assaulting environmental regulations vs Promoting a balanced cost effective approach to ensure the regulations do not cost our society more than they are worth.
Assault public education funding vs ensuring that the tax payer's money is used effectively so people can keep more of their paycheck.
I look at both sides all the time. That's the point of G2A, I like to challenge my beliefs and those of others. Now can you truly believe that those you call oppressors could actually be the freedom fighters? Or at least that they truly believe they are... Just as you truly believe you are on the side of "good"." G2A
Thoughts?