Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Wisdom: Education, Experience & Openness

Someone unintentionally implied that I was no more capable or wise than my 26 year old self. (or I was just overly sensitive :-) ) That got me thinking about how people become wiser and more capable with time, and why some people do not.

Being a naturally self confident know it all, I can say now that I lived on "Mt Stupid" when I was young.  I am sure that I was very annoying to my parents, siblings, friends, co-workers, bosses, etc.  Times were so easy back then because "I knew everything and it was all Black and White".

Then came the education, experiences and interactions over the last 30 years.
  • MBA courses, 6 Sigma Courses, and more
  • Supervisory and interpersonal training self study
  • Decades of marriage and the raising of 3 children
  • Suffering a major panic attach while travelling (ie anxiety)
  • Distinctly different position in 3 different companies
  • Being laid off out of the blue
  • Working and negotiating people all over the world
  • Working and socializing with people from many cultures
  • Dozens of home improvement projects
  • Oh so many errors and screw ups (ie learning opportunities)
  • Researching so many topics for G2A
  • etc
Now I likely seem to still be a self confident know it all to you, however I can tell you that I now have more questions than at any other time of my life.  The world is much more gray and the solutions all come with benefits, costs and unknown potential consequences.

I thought the curve below explained things well.  When we start out as young adults, many of us live between the "Peak of Mt Stupid" and the "Valley of Despair" depending on the day, the topic and our personality type.

Then our education, experiences and interactions, and our Openness to learn from them and challenge our confirmation bias and existing beliefs determine how "wise and capable" we will become.  For example:
  • If one does the same things in the same town in the same ways for 60 years, they may be wise in a very narrow band.
  • If one travels the world and is not open to learning from the people in different cultures they may get limited benefit.
  • If one watches only FOX News you may actually lose wisdom. :-)
  • If one actively pursues life long learning, pays attention when in new situations and is willing to challenge their prior beliefs, they likely will be very different at age 54 than at age 26.
Now please look at the shape of the "Slope of Enlightenment". Like most things we learn quickly at first and then things slow as we get older.  And I think that is where "Openness" and a willingness to push our comfort zones become most important and make the biggest difference if you want to continuously learn and grow..

As always, I thank my G2A and Facebook friends who keep challenging me and forcing me to research, analyze, learn, consider, etc... :-)  Thoughts?

17 comments:

Laurie said...

I'm not sure how many years I have been reading your blog but I think your views have changed over the time that I have been reading. I think you have been become less conservative. I disagree with you less than I used to. You do still have a few extreme views however.

John said...

Why thank you !!! :-)

It has been a learning experience !!!

Laurie said...

Here is a book excerpt to see how your views have changed and if you have become less partisan:

How The GOP Gave Up On Governing In Order To Keep Winning Elections

I think you view both parities as similar which they are not.

John said...

Really... An opinion piece by the producer of the Rachel Maddow show?

I am equally non-partisan... Both parties are terrible... Just look who they have picked as Presidential nominees... :-(

And how is Joe trying to choose the "best" Vice President. Must be a Black Woman... Who makes this stuff up?

We have Dem Socialists and Religious Right Nut cases driving insanity in our politics

Definitely not ready to move to either "dark side". :-)

jerrye92002 said...

I simply put forth two things: First, that every election represents a binary choice. There is no zero-and-a-half on the ballot. Pick one, or let those who don't care pick for you. Second, be happy. "Whether or not it is clear to you, the universe is unfolding as it should."

John said...

I think many would disagree, especially our kids. :-(

Laurie said...

Your quick dismissal of an idea based on that it comes from a liberal is very closeminded. A better argument from your point of view is that you support limited government and so don't care that the republicans are anti governing.

John said...

Laurie,
If you want the longer answer. Here goes.

Democrats seem to want to use the Federal government to force their Dem Socialist like and Big Regulation / Protection policies across the whole country. You call this governing, I call it federal over reach.

The GOP seems to still be against this except in the "sin law" categories.

The USA works well because a lot of the work is done in the States. And the States can do things differently depending on the will of their citizens.

I am thinking you would happy if we got rid of states and made them districts under the control of the Federal government. Is that correct?

John said...

Ezra Klein was praising DEM Polarization and Party Politics Today :-(

John said...

One more question, if you think the Federal government should not be in the healthcare, welfare, education, etc business...

And you think they should focus on Defense, interstate infrastructure, interstate business, law / order, etc...

What would your proposal look like other than "get them out of the way of the States"? :-)

John said...

It is kind of like your husband wanting to buy a new expensive car.

And you being dead set against it.

Would you negotiate on colors or just say NO?


Does that mean you are against discussing colors? :-)

jerrye92002 said...

PMFBI, but the operative phrase is "promote the general welfare." The federal government, when it stoops to PROVIDE individuals with "welfare," has stepped beyond its ability, "rising to the level of incompetence" as well as exceeding its constitutional authority. It's not just "illegal" it is un-smart.

John said...

Jerry,
I am more interested in your perspective on continuous education and growth?

From my perspective you have pretty much not changed or grown in 12 years...

I only say that because your comments sound nearly identical to when we started, and Lord knows contradictory sources and views rarely seem to even sway you a little...

So do you think you have plateaued or "learned everything"?

Why do you think you are the way you are?

Is it a good or bad thing?

jerrye92002 said...

I think it is a very good thing to not only know what one believes, but also why. Better yet to be able to defend those views against shallow attempts to the contrary. I suppose you could say that "continuous education and growth" is more or less confined to what one would expect from confirmation bias, but so long as the overwhelming body of factual evidence supports my "opinion," what else do I have to know?

Contradictory /views/ do not sway me and they should not. Contradictory /sources/ might sway me if they were clearly factual and did not waffle about. Unfortunately, none of your sources or opinions seem sufficiently robust to bolster your arguments, and that is not my fault.

And to answer your question about "what would it look like"? It would be that authority should be "reserved to the states" and that the federal government would return to its constitutional duties to only PROMOTE the GENERAL welfare by getting out of the way of States' economic development of their citizenry.

John said...

So in essence, you know best and can learn little more.

I would definitely call that plateaued.


I mean you still insist that COVID is going away.

John said...

Please note that I picked FOX News to ensure you did not "shoot the messenger"

jerrye92002 said...

My knowledge has not "plateaued." But nobody has put forth anything approaching a rational, factual argument to the contrary. Why do these conversations remind me of the recent adage "It is impossible to reason a man out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place."

And your Fox article is an opinion based on a model, which we all know is faulty from the get-go. NOT a fact, and not valuable taken out of context like that. Do I need to quote Sgt. Joe Friday?