- defining acronyms and the different tests
- explaining the general history of the "accountability" movement
- listening and responding to questions
- describing the real flaws of NCLB (ie includes Spec ed and non-English speaking students)
- reviewing district "avg" performance against state and national stats
- explaining the differences and gaps by demographics
- spent significant time explaining flaws of current accountability systems (ie government set too aggressive of targets)
- used too many generalities (ie possibly apples & oranges)
- little if any discussion of specific plans to close gaps
- somewhat misleading or unclear graphs (ie partial y axis made differences look more significant than they are, using todays performance std distribution to estimate future performance non-proficiency rates{instead of explaining that std dist curve is supposed to shift as more kids become proficient}, etc)
- did not detail "one school" as a case study (ie explain myths in detail and how they misled)
In summary, it was a good general learning experience with some marketing / political spin. Most importantly, it reminded me that "we need to look at the details"... Not just the headlines... (ie especially with AYP results) Both sides can find their message in the data, so be an informed citizen and look for yourselves...
MN Report Cards and Data