We are arguing AGAIN over here about if Charter or Traditional Public Schools (TPS) are better. The above graphic come from a
CREDO NY Study. (
CREDO Site) Now I agree with the factors they use to match and compare schools:
- Grade level
- Gender
- Race/Ethnicity
- Free or Reduced Price Lunch Status
- English Language Learner Status
- Special Education Status
- Prior test score on New York state achievement tests
Except. How does one account for what the child'(s) parent(s) are like? Please remember that I think student success is 70% due to their parent(s) and community, and ~30% due to the school /teachers.
Now a Charter and TPS may be in the same community with similar student demographics, and
have TOTALLY DIFFERENT parental demographics. Please remember that the TPS is the default
- The TPS gets every unlucky child who's parent do not make the effort or know enough to do anything special academically for their child(ren).
- The Charter will only have families where the parent(s) are aware, motivated and cared enough about academics to get their lucky child enrolled.
Now Jerry loves Charters and Vouchers for this reason. They make it easier for concerned and capable parent(s) with Lucky children to run from their Unlucky neighbor children who have Deadbeat or incapable parent(s).
Just like when parent(s) who can afford it move to a more expensive neighborhood with "better schools"... Which we all know means "neighborhood with more capable people"...
So to me Charters and Vouchers have an upside in that more Lucky kids (ie good capable parents & no significant special needs) can get into schools with more kids like themselves. The downside of course is that leaves the TPS with an ever higher density of Unlucky kids. At which time the Charter school advocates:
- Blame the TPS for failing with the most challenging families...
- Praise the Charter for helping out the simplest families...
It is kind of like when people say that Wayzata district is better than Robbinsdale...
Which is so silly since you are comparing apples and oranges. So my questions as always...
- Do some Charters do better than the local TPS because they have the neighborhood kids with capable responsible parent(s) and the TPS got the dregs?
- Do some Charters do worse than the local TPS because they have a much higher population of parent(s) who have low English capability? (family chose "Somali Charter school" to avoid change / assimilation)
- How do we really know which schools are doing well because of their systems, employees, curriculum?
- How do we know which schools are doing well because the have good capable family / parental / community support?