Apparently if you vote "correctly". :-) I had to share this wonderful postcard I received from the GOP. And don't forget:
- Trump just suggested people illegally vote and Source 2
- The AG is pumping Unsubstantiated threats
- and trying to justify poll watchers?
- Trump pushes Debunked Assault on Mail In
- and the hypocrite votes by mail
Now isn't the job of the President and the AG to encourage all eligible citizens to vote safely, and to ensure people believe in the US Voting System? Instead we have these yahoos trying to undermine the system and spread fear... How can anyone tolerate this self serving activity by our civil servants?
10 comments:
Perhaps you should ask Democrat Secretary of State why, in addition to all the known ways to cheat at an election, he is strenuously trying to add several more, by hook or crook.
I am not going down that rabbit hole again.
My point is that the the GOP, Trump and Barr should be discussing very specific issues...
Registration Methods, Verification Methods, Mail Service Security issues and be working on helping to address those. Maybe through additional funding where appropriate.
Instead they are seeking to plant fear and distrust regarding "Mail In Voting" and the US Election System in General. Which is a TERRIBLE Anti-American Goal !!!
I see. So you agree "there is no voter fraud in Minnesota"? You are simply admitting that you can't find what you do not seek, and willing to overlook the many POSSIBLE yet preventable ways it could occur. I don't think they need to be specific, either. First of all, it's not a federal job; elections are controlled by the States. Second, the evidence is everywhere-- new reports of counties where there are more registered voters than citizens, Reviews of voter rolls showing 10% errors on average, convicted fraudsters. And in MN, tens of thousands of ballots counted BEFORE being found ineligible, and the court cases with the Democrats on the side of MORE potential fraud (aka "improper voting").
"plant fear and mistrust"??? What if fear and mistrust is warranted due to the overwhelming evidence before us?
"You are simply admitting that you can't find what you do not seek, and willing to overlook the many POSSIBLE yet preventable ways it could occur."
Are we talking about Trump's thoughts on testing and your support of the same?
Moose
Jerry,
If you think the POTUS and AG should be undermining the election results by making false claims. You are in a sadder state than I thought.
Factcheck Barr 1
Factcheck Barr 2
Factcheck Barr 3
Factcheck Trump 1
And of course the total hypocrisy on display of asking me to vote by mail while working to destroy confidence in mail in voting... I pray he is gone in 6 months and in jail in 12 months... :-)
Let's hope that people vote early so an election day crush can be minimized.
And if you think Secretary of State Simon intends to conduct a fair an honest election, you've been smoking too much Maui Wowie. STILL no distinction between normal mail-in absentee voting, which is already subject to fraud-- well-known fact-- and total "mail out" balloting in which every one of the registered voters gets sent a ballot, and which in a recent Nevada election some 80% of ballots could not be declared from a legitimate voter, not to mention the normal 10% error in the voter rolls PLUS those counties where there are more registered voters than eligible residents.
Absentee voting in MN is being made Worse by SOS's recent proclamations that witness signatures are not needed, and that challenged voters may vote absentee without challenge, and that counting need not be done by bipartisan citizen election judges, as they are at the polls (and he is challenging even /that/). AND we're not going to stop counting until ten days after the election! How many ballots can be found in the trunk of a car? Deny everything-- la-la-la-la-la. If your guy wins it will be proof positive there was massive cheating. How are you going to prove otherwise?
Avoiding the topic of the post as usual.
"there is no voter fraud in Minnesota"
Things certainly do go wrong on election day. anything a hundred and thirty million people is bound to have screw ups. If our standard for legitimacy is perfection, no election in history has been legitimate. I do note that Hillary Clinton won the last election by three million votes and yet Donald Trump is the president. How does the rare and isolated error, in terms of legitimacy, compare with that?
--Hiram
Post a Comment